Published for, July 18th, 2012

Yesterday I wrote about Senator Murray’s tax increase threat and compared it to the Tea Party / conservative Republican debt limit threat of last summer.  A friend pointed out that in her threat Senator Murray left herself an escape hatch.

Here is the key sentence from the Senator’s Monday speech at Brookings (emphasis is mine).

So if we can’t get a good deal—a balanced deal that calls on the wealthy to pay their fair share—then I will absolutely continue this debate into 2013, rather thanlock in a long-term deal this year that throws middle class families under the bus.

With this language Senator Murray did not rule out supporting a one or two year extension of all income tax rates, including the top rates.  She only ruled out “locking in a long-term deal this year.”

Technically she could also agree to a long-term deal that extends all the tax rates, as long as it was enacted in 2013 rather than this year.  She could, for instance, vote for a two month extension of all rates in December, allowing President Romney and Republican House and Senate majorities to then enact a long-term extension of all rates without her vote.   I think that is a minor scenario compared with the primary flexibility she left herself to support a one or two year extension of all tax rates if President Obama is reelected.

Full post here

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)